When writing a proposal it’s important to have an effective plan. The plan describes the problem and how it should be solved. The plan should first explain the proposed procedure and then certain steps which should be clearly labeled and easy to understand. There should also be a timeline chart that explains the plan. The chart should have effective labels and graphics to appeal to the audience. It is important for the plan to be consistent throughout the proposal. In the following paragraphs I will describe and critique the different research plans and focus on the strengths and weaknesses of each.

            The first research plan is proposing for a renovation of the recreational intramural fields. In my opinion this is a good concept, but this plan did not explain the importance of the renovation or why it was needed. This plan was difficult to understand. I think it could be improved by using more everyday terms that the average person can understand. The time periods for this project seem unrealistic to me. I think it will take longer than the time shown.  The strengths of this plan are that the six steps are labeled and in a consistent order with one another. The timeline chart for this plan is color coded and labeled according to the steps previously described. The timeline also keeps record of the dates in which the steps are to be completed.

            The next plan is proposing changes to be made to the health code in all
Lubbock area restaurants.  I found this plan to be very effective. The proposed procedure is clearly stated and easy to understand. Like the first proposal the steps are labeled and in a consistent order. Bullets are also used which makes information stand out.  The time period for this proposal is realistic. Another strength in this plan is the timeline chart. It is clearly labeled and color coded. The only thing I would add to this plan is a budget section.

            The last research plan is describing a proposed plan for an underground pedestrian tunnel. I thought this plan was effective and well written. The procedure is clearly stated. It explains the possible benefits of having a tunnel and why one is needed.  This plan also included research from other universities with pedestrian tunnels. Another strength was the budget was included in the plan. The steps are clearly labeled and easy to identify and the timeline chart is color coded and labeled accordingly. Overall, this plan was very consistent throughout; the only thing I might change would be to add bullets so that important information can be viewed easily.

            After doing this reader response, I now have a better understanding of what to include in a research plan, as well as what to leave out. This assignment will help when we are drafting our group proposal. I will be sure to include all of the correct information in order to have a good research plan.